Clinical psychiatry WF-PS-N-PKL
Topics:
Lectures:
1-2. Legal regulations for the assessments submitted in criminal proceedings
3-4. Legal regulations for the assessments submitted in civil proceedings
5-6. Expert psychiatric opinion concerning marital matters.
7-8. Legal regulations for the assessments submitted in juvenile proceedings
9-10. Forensic psychiatric assessments in legal proceedings
11-12. Assessment of responsibility
13-14. Detension regulations
15. Summing up
Classes:
1-2. How to write a forensic psychiatric assessment
3-4. Specificity of psychiatric assessments for the court
5-6. Criteria of assessing the offender’s ability to stand the trial
7-8. Assessing legal incapacitation.
9-10. Assessing the validity of testaments
11-12. Assessing psychic abilities to get married
13-14. Assessments in compensation cases
15. Summing up
(in Polish) E-Learning
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
Knowledge: A student has knowledge on what issues forensic psychiatry deals with, including judicature in criminal, civil and juvenile cases, knows the policy of writing an opinion, can define the role of court expert, explains the bases of law normalization, which apply in writing an opinion for a need of process organ.
Skills: A student can find relation between law normalization, opinion demands and mantles of course expert in criminal, civil and juvenile cases, critically estimates forensically-psychiatric materials, organizes and classifies psychopathological and judical knowledge and on the grounds of them, comes to a conclusion of a opinion, is able to use an opinion criteria in a practical way, can construct a plan of judicial expertise.
Capacity: A student acts with opinion principles, exercises caution and responsibility in creating forensic-psychiatric evaluation, notices the relation between conclusions of an opinion and process consequences, aims to conserve objectivity in his evaluations, is open on work in a team of experts.
ECTS:
Taking part in a lecture – 30 hours
Taking part in exercises – 30 hours
Preparation for a lecture - 15 hours
Preparation for exercises – 15 hours
Consultations – 5 hours
Writing an essay – 15 hours
Preparation for an exam (lecture) – 25 hours
Preparation for an exam (exercises) – 15 hours
Sum of hours – 150 [150 : 30 (25) = 5]
Number of ECTS – 5
Assessment criteria
Knowledge:
(2): A student doesn’t know what issues forensic psychiatry deals with, doesn’t know major principles of writing an opinion, doesn’t know basic law normalizations, which have usage in writing an opinion for a need of process organ.
(3): A student has general knowledge from forensic psychiatry, but is unable to show its specifics in certain types of lawsuits, knows some principles of writing an opinion and law normalizations.
(4): A student has accurate knowledge from forensic psychiatry, including judicature in different types of lawsuits, knows major principles of writing an opinion, is able to describe the role of an expert, knows the basics of law normalizations.
(5): A student has perfect knowledge from the field of forensic psychiatry, including different types of lawsuits, knows the principles of writing an opinion and white task, knows law normalizations in details.
Skills:
(2): A student is unable to find the usage of law normalizations on his own, doesn’t know the range of forensic-psychiatric material, doesn’t understand the principles of writing an opinion.
(3): A student do not understand the relation between law normalization and opinion demands in every type of lawsuit, identifies the range of forensic-psychiatric material, but cannot critically asses its value, has difficulties with justifying the choice of creating an opinion criteria.
(4): A student correctly interprets the relations between law normalizations and opinion requirements and expert’s mantles in different types of lawsuits, knows the range of forensic-psychiatric material and critically evaluates its value, is able to justify the principles of reviewing.
(5): A student perfectly knows the relations between law normalizations and the principles of opinion and the expert’s mantles in different types of lawsuits, critically evaluates forensic-psychiatric material, can organize and classify psychopathological and judicial knowledge, knows the principles of conclusion of the opinion and the rules of construction of judicial expertise.
Capacity:
The rank of an opinion principles is marked, the role of an expert and openness on cooperation with other experts.
Bibliography
Gierowski J. K., Szymusik A. (red.): Postępowanie karne i cywilne wobec osób zaburzonych psychicznie. Collegium Medicum, Kraków, 1996.
Gierowski J. K., Paprzycki K. K.: Niepoczytalność i psychiatryczne środki zabezpieczające. Zagadnienia prawno-materialne, procesowe, psychiatryczne i psychologiczne. Wydawnictwo C. H. Beck, Warszawa, 2013.
Habzda-Siwek E.: Diagnoza stanu psychicznego sprawcy a rozstrzygnięcia w procesie karnym. Zakamycze, Kraków, 2002.
Hajdukiewicz D.: Podstawy prawne opiniowania sądowo-psychiatrycznego
w postępowaniu karnym, w sprawach o wykroczenia oraz sprawach nieletnich. IPiN, Warszawa, 2007.
Hajdukiewicz D.: Opiniowanie sądowo-psychiatryczne w sprawach cywilnych. IPiN, Warszawa, 2008.
Hajdukiewicz D.: Zagadnienia psychiatrii sądowej. Część I. Podstawy prawne i medyczne. IPiN, Warszawa, 2016.
Klasyfikacja zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania w ICD-10. UWM „Vesalius”- IPiN, Kraków - Warszawa 1997.
Lew-Starowicz Z.: Seksuologia sądowa. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa, 2000.
Majchrzyk Z.: Nieletni, młodociani i dorośli sprawcy zabójstw. IPiN, Warszawa, 2001.
Majchrzyk Z.: Zabójczynie i zabójcy. Wydawnictwo UKSW, Warszawa, 2008.
Didactic materials can be found on Moodle.
Notes
Term 2021/22_Z:
Basic knowledge of biological, psychological and social conditioning of human behavior. |
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: