Research in the field of fundamental theology WT-SSTN-RI
1. Methodology of theology and fundamental theology
2. Writing papers in fundamental theology
3. Linguistic issues of scientific papers, scientific language
4. Elements of scientific papers: introduction, chapters and conclusion
5. Main sources in fundamental theology
6. Basic themes and vocabulary in fundamental theology
7. Finding new areas of interest in fundamental theology
8. Peer reviewing of the students’ papers
(in Polish) E-Learning
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
knowledge:
1. The student knows the history of the theological method,
2. knows elements of the theological fundamental method,
3. masters various theological fundamental issues.
skills:
1. The student is able to discern between different theological disciplines,
2. correctly uses methodological issues in his papers, creates a plan of his research and paper
3. peer reviews others’ papers regarding methodological discipline.
social competences:
1. The student is able to discuss about methodology in science,
2. searches out various approaches of fundamental theology and implements them in scientific work
3. works in group to individualize new problems in fundamental theology and ways to approach them
Assessment criteria
Methods:
1. work in groups, analysis of selected texts, discussion,
2. assessment of the stage of advancement of the scientific work preparation, active participation during classes
Evaluation criteria:
Knowledge:
unsatisfactory (fail - 2): the student does not have basic knowledge about scientific work,
satisfactory (3): knows elementary methods of scientific work, is able to accumulate research material,
good (4): has mastered the research methods well and implements them in scientific work
very good (5): selects specific topics from fundamental theology for further analysis
Skills:
unsatisfactory (2): the student can't build his own research technique,
satisfactory (3): have the ability to develop the scientific data properly,
good (4): seeks to respond to the raised scientific problems,
very good (5): proposes and develops original topics for scientific work.
Social Competences:
unsatisfactory (2): the student does not know how to use the acquired knowledge on methodology,
satisfactory (3): sees the social context of scientific work though does not develop research methods,
good (4): uses the research method to solve ecclesiastical and social problems,
very good (5): works interdisciplinary; follows the ongoing changes in the issues of fundamental theology and its methods.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: