Philosophical foundations of pedagogy WNP-PEZ-FPP
1. Clarification of what philosophical knowledge is: Perennial philosophy as love of wisdom; Philosophical disciplines; Philosophy and other types of knowledge : science, humanities, social sience, pedagogy; wisdom (practical and theoretical); faith; worldview; ideology; Formal object of philosophy; Methods of philosophy; Goal of philosophical cognition; Eras, currents, trends and schools of philosophy.
2. Selected philosophical problems: values (truth, good, beauty); Faith and reason; Language and communication; Cognition of being, cognition of God, cognition of man; Human freedom; Person and society, religion, education and upbringing.
(in Polish) E-Learning
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
Subject level
(in Polish) Punkty ECTS
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
(K) A student defines the essence of philosophical cognition (an objective, a method, a subject); distinguishes types of philosophical cognition (differences of subjects, methods, objectives); points to changes taking place in philosophy in its history, explains the relationships between philosophical and pedagogical knowledge;
(S) A student can formulate in philosophical language the problems relating to observed socio-cultural phenomena;
(C) A student demonstrates care in the use of philosophical language, obtains basic sensitivity to metaphysical problems, and is aware of the difference of philosophical and other types of knowledge.
STUDENT’ACTIVITY and hour labour inputs
Lecture hours .......................................... 15
Preparing for classes .................................. 30
Reading ............................................. 40
Sitting for an exam ......................... 40
____________________________________________
Total number of ECTS credits 5
Assessment criteria
1) A forming evaluation
– for grade 2 (unsatisfactory) – A student does not know the definitions of the basic concepts of philosophy, does not distinguish between elementary facts from the history of philosophy: eras, directions, schools and philosophers;
– for grade 3 (satisfactory) – A student correctly demonstrates knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy, but has no ability to analyze the relationships between various philosophical concepts on basic philosophical problems
– for grade 4 (good) – A Student not only properly presents knowledge of the fundamental concepts of philosophy, but can make basic comparisons of the philosophical interpretations of being, cognition, man and values that appeared in the history of philosophy, thus a student sees basic differences and similarities of the aforementioned concepts.
– for grade 5 (very good) – A student not only compares the various philosophical interpretations of the abovementioned concepts, but is able to draw conclusions from the comparisons made.
2)A final grade: To obtain a final mark, the student will be required to pass a test to demonstrate familiarity with the content of lectures, suggested textbook, obligatory reading and additional reading for the lecture. The test consists of 14-15 tasks. For grade 3.0 a student needs 7-8 pionts; for grade 3.5 - 9-10 points; for grade 4,0 - 11-12 points; for grade 4,5 - 13 points; for grade 5,0 - 14-15 points.
Bibliography
1. textbook: M. A. Krąpiec, S. Kamiński, Z. Zdybicka [i inni], Wprowadzenie do filozofii, Lublin 1996; R. Darowski, Filozofia człowieka. Zarys problematyki. Antologia tekstów, Kraków 2002;
2. Source literature: M.M. Boużyk Wychowanie otwarte na religię, Warszawa 2013; A. Bronk, Nauka wobec religii, Lublin 1996; S. Kamiński, Jak filozofować? Lublin 1989; Jan Paweł II, Encyklika Fides et Ratio, Watykan 1998; B. Kiereś, Człowiek i wychowanie. Od osoby do osobowości, Lublin 2017; H. Kiereś, Spór o sztukę, Lublin 1996;S. Kowalczyk, Człowiek w poszukiwaniu wartości. Elementy aksjologii personalistycznej, Lublin 2006; M.A. Krąpiec, Dlaczego zło?, Lublin 1995; M. A. Krąpiec, Suwerenność- czyja? Lublin 1996; M. A. Krąpiec, Ja- człowiek, Lublin 1991; M. A. Krąpiec, Język i świat realny, Lublin 1985; M. A. Krąpiec, U podstaw rozumienia kultury, Lublin 1991;J. Ratzinger, Wiara, prawda, tolerancja, Kielce 2005; T. Stępień, Wprowadzenie do antropologii filozoficznej św. Tomasza z Akwinu, Warszawa 2013; W. Vossenkuhl, Możliwość dobra. Etyka XXI wieku, Kraków 2012; Leksykon filozofii klasycznej, Lublin 1997.
3. popular science literatura: W. Chudy, Drugie śniadanie u Sokratesa, Warszawa 2004 M. A. Krąpiec, Porzucić świat absurdów, Lublin 2002; M. Adler, Dziesięć błędów filozoficznych, Warszawa; S. Swieżawski, Istnienie i tajemnica, Lublin 1993; K. Wojtyła, Rozważania o istocie człowieka, Kraków 1999.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: