Polish Thinkers Between Philosophy and Psychology (Lewicki - Gierulanka - Półtawski) WF-FI-PIEKAR2-20-ER
The aim of the lecture is to discuss theoretical proposals of Polish thinkers who creatively combined in their philosophy threads and psychological analyzes. Based on the works of Andrzej Lewicki, Danuta Gierulanka and Andrzej Półtawski, will be discussed the possibilities of combining philosophy with psychology and will be justified the thesis according to which the creative dialogue of these disciplines contributes to mutual benefits.
(in Polish) E-Learning
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
• Knowledge: student knows the basis of Lewicki's, Gierulanka's and Półtawski's i conceptions, their terminology and concepts. He recognizes the basic philosophical problems concerning these approaches. He understands the specific relation between philosophy and psychology.
• Abilities: student single-handedly reads and understands the more philosophical articles concerning Lewicki's, Gierulanka's and Półtawski's conceptions.
• Expertise: student efficiently organizes his work.
Assessment criteria
Lecture with elements of the conservatory. Joint reading of texts and discussion.
• 2 - student doesn't know the basis of Lewicki's, Gierulanka's and Półtawski's i conceptions. He doesn't recognize the most important thesis and problems concerning these approaches.
• 3 - student badly knows the basis of Lewicki's, Gierulanka's and Półtawski's i conceptions. He cannot recognize the most important thesis and problems concerning these approaches.
• 4 - student knows the basis of Lewicki's, Gierulanka's and Półtawski's i conceptions. He recognizes the most important thesis and problems concerning these approaches.
• 5 - student very good knows basis of Lewicki's, Gierulanka's and Półtawski's i conceptions. He recognizes the most important thesis and problems concerning these approaches, and he can use this conception into philosophical discussion.
Exam - Oral Exam and/or writing an essay
Practical placement
n/a
Bibliography
Andrzej Lewicki:
- (1955). Mechanizm odróżniania w świetle nauki Pawłowa. Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
- (1960). Procesy poznawcze i orientacja w otoczeniu. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
- (2016). Cognition as Orientation in the Environment. Translation:
M. Kopczyńska. Avant, VII, 3/2016, 46-67. DOI: 10.26913/70302016.0109.0004
Danuta Gierulanka:
- 1958: O przyswajaniu sobie pojęć geometrycznych. Warszawa: PWN. G
- 1962: Zagadnienie swoistości poznania matematycznego. Warszawa: PWN.
- 1964. Pozycja epistemologiczna rozumienia. W: Dąmbska I., Gierulanka D. i in., red.: Szkice filozoficzne. Romanowi Ingardenowi w darze. Warszawa— Kraków: PWN, 141—157.
Andrzej Półtawski
- 1966. Rzeczy i dane zmysłowe. Świat i spostrzeżenie u G. E. Moore’a. Warszawa: PWN.
- 1973. Świat, spostrzeżenie, świadomość. Fenomenologiczna koncepcja świadomości i realizm. Warszawa: PWN.
- 2001. Realizm fenomenologii. Husserl – Ingarden – Stein – Wojtyła. Odczyty
i rozprawy. Toruń: Wyd. Rolewski.
-2011. Po co filozofować? Ingarden – Wojtyła – skąd i dokąd?. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza.
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: