Selected bioethical issues WSR-NR-2-WZB
The lecture is a continuation of classes conducted under the title: basics of bioethics. This time, selected issues in the field of ethical (especially Catholic) assessment of biotechnological interference in the life of a human (direct or indirect) are raised, in particular when it is in the so-called in decline, that is, when he is sick, suffering and on his way to death.
It includes o answer to the question whether what is technologically possible is also ethically allowed when such issues as: the concept of death and dying, euthanasia, clinical death, coma, aging of humans and society, but also: food safety . responsibility for human health, etc.
The knowledge gained in this field should be used in work for the social good, secured primarily within such a community as the family, and more specifically in the process of social, democratic justification for the protection of its dignity and rights, understood in the spirit of the Catholic tradition.
This is to help in gaining adequate social competences. It includes o awareness of the need to have and constantly deepen ethical (normative) justifications as to the biotechnological and civil-legal interference in human life carried out in medicine or in other fields of social life.
|
Term 2021/22_Z:
None |
Term 2022/23_Z:
None |
(in Polish) E-Learning
Term 2020/21_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) | Term 2019/20_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) | Term 2021/22_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning | Term 2022/23_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) |
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
(in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Term 2020/21_Z: obligatory | Term 2019/20_Z: obligatory | Term 2024/25_L: obligatory | Term 2021/22_Z: obligatory | Term 2022/23_Z: optional with unlimited choices |
Preliminary Requirements
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
Knowledge:
NRM_W03. The graduate has an ordered knowledge of philosophy, Catholic theology, Catholic social science and canon law; on the basis of the above-mentioned
range understands the interaction between reason and faith.
NRM_W09. The graduate has in-depth knowledge of the principles and ethical standards in marriage, family and social life
Skills:
NRM_05: Graduate - can use detailed rules and ethical norms in order to search for solutions to specific marital and family problems.
NRM_U10: Has the ability to understand the importance of the influence of cultural factors on marital and family life; understanding the sacred and theological dimensions of marriage and family.
Competences:
NRM_K02: The graduate has a deep conviction that it is necessary to act ethically and professionally; sees and formulates moral problems and ethical dilemmas related to his own work and that of others, seeks optimal solutions, and acts in accordance with the principles of ethics; is aware of the ethical dimension in scientific research.
NRM_K03. Recognizes the importance of family science for functional creation and development
family, has a positive attitude to continuous learning
in the field of family sciences and building a workshop for a specialist in
marriage and family.
Assessment criteria
Methods of verification of learning outcomes:
Formal methods:
1. Dialogue and didactic discussion.
2. Feedback.
3. Reading essays.
4. Colloquium (at the end of the semester).
Substantive criterion for grading the assessment:
Grade 2: The student did not participate in the classes (online), did not pass the test showing knowledge (required by the learning outcomes), did not demonstrate the expected skills and competences (no essay published on MOODLE.
Grade 3: The student has passed the attendance, demonstrated the necessary knowledge (specified in the learning outcomes) at the test, presents skills and competences (he published a personalized essay on MOODLE.
Grade 4: As above, but it is about a much higher level of knowledge, competence and skills.
Grade 5: As above, and the student's level is very good. Moreover, the student is able to defend (adequately justify) his position in the discussion.
Final grade percentage criteria:
Up to 30% - active presence at the lecture (online).
Up to 30% - publication of MOODLE essays (factual and formal correctness).
Up to 40% - demonstrating an adequate level of substantive knowledge (online) at the test.
Minimum to pass the course - 65%, etc.
Bibliography
1. Pro bono publico, persone et familiae. Some aspects of activities for the common good of the person, family and society, ed. W. Guzewicz et al., Ełk 2018.
2. Bioetyka, W. Chańska - J. Różyńska (ed.), Warsaw 2013.
3. S. Biały, Selected issues in bioethics, "Episteme" 55 (2006).
4. A. Laun, Contemporary issues of moral theology, Krakow 2002.
5. M. Nowacka, Ethics and transplantations, Warsaw 2003.
6. To live with dignity in a changing world, edited by Z. Sareło, Ząbki 2004.
7. T. Ślipko, Granice życia. Dilemmas of contemporary bioethics, Krakow 1994.
8. E. Kowalski, Person and bioethics, Krakow 2009.
9. W. Bołoz, Bioethics and human rights, Warsaw 2007.
10. C. Guerreschi, New addictions, Kraków 2010.
11. M. Grzymkowska, Bioethical standards in European law, Warsaw 2009.
12. I. Mroczkowski, The nature of the human person. Fundamentals of human identity, Płock 2012.
|
Term 2021/22_Z:
None |
Term 2022/23_Z:
None |
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: