The Third Sector and Community Development WSE-SO-TSaCD
INTRODUCTION
Basic concepts: Third Sector - definitions and relations with other sectors, and concepts :
TS–NPO–NGOs –Independent Sector -Civil Society – social economy.
TS as an object of research : an interdisciplinary & comparative perspective – Europe and USA.
Community Development (CD)- the concept of community intersector dynamics
The possible roles of TS in CD – social innovation and well-being
Community Development (CD)
conceptS of community
- a holistic model of local community
- community-based development
- local capital generating strategies
- local risk-reducing strategies
-measuring community development - dual approach /objective-subjective
economic and social indicators
-community cohesion and well-being
Definitional problems (Hillery 1995: 94 definitions of ‘thing’ called community)
„A community is a group of people connected by the physical or virtual locations in which they dwell or congregate, organizations they form, and cultural values and symbols they share”
Communities are affected (and defined) by forces that affect their members and their space.
maxi-min (Weberian ideal-type) way of dedfining: extension vs. Intention of a concept.
Origin and development of TS in Europe and USA:
The Third Sector in the classical traditions of social, political and economic theories.
Historical trends and contemporary directions of influences on local communities, societies and economies: giving - altruism– and reciprocity – philantropy
The role of TS in contemporary public policies – CD, ‘tertiarization’, ‘hybridization of social services, etc.
The Third Sector’s Role in Community Development: research methodology
different approaches and their implications for local/national and international/global scale:
(i) socio-economic, statistical/descriptive and classification-focused;
(ii) analytical, evaluation and practice –focused (including management, capacity building, leadership, etc.)
Research on civic participation and civic engagement - volunteerism and civicness in a comparative context .
Evaluation of TS effects and performance of TSOs at different contexts and problems/programs :
- types of evaluation strategies and analyzes of TSOs’ influence in the CD process
-- focus on TSOs’ contribution to (community) well-being – individual/subjective and social W-B
Measurement issues - in a comparative (international) context.
Sources for TSOs’ pro-community development activities and their performance and effectiveness
social needs current and future
organizational and managerial forms of different types of TSOs – focus on their role in the context of CD and community well-being
voluntary activity and civic engagement.
A spatial / ecological perspective on the TS&CD research.
Term 2022/23_Z:
EFFECTS |
(in Polish) E-Learning
Term 2020/21_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy | Term 2021/22_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) | Term 2022/23_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy |
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
(in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
EFFECTS
A student who completes this class should be able to:
Characterize the TS in relation to other sectors, in general and especially in the local context.
Explain the role played by nonprofit organizations, in a society and in the community.
Describe what is meant by community development (CD), along with variety of forms and roles played by the TS organizations in CD.
Analyze some TS- and CD- and TS&CD- related policy issues focusing on tose for which the TS organizations seem to be best suitable.
Incorporate problem of CD into the functioning of nonprofit organizations / civic engamement (at the local level).
Explain the CD as the social process – with TS as its key (local) ‘actor’/agent, including possible multi-stakeholder arrangements.
Describe some of the fundamentals of multidisciplinary policy-oriented studies for CD planning purposes (decision-making), with participation of TS.
Demonstrate the ability to solve CD-related problem(s) and to evaluate the role and contribution of the TS organizations (in an empirical context).
Assessment criteria
ASSIGNMENTS & GRADING
Assignment Due date Percent of final grade
Take-home paper TBA 70 percent
Participation (no more than 3 absences) 30 percent
Bibliography
REQUIRED READING
Anheier, Helmut K., 2005. „ Nonprofit Organizations: An Introduction”, Routledge.
Boris, Elizabeth T., Steuerle, C. E. 2006. „Nonprofits and Government. Collaboration and Conflict”. The Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C.
Defourny, J., Pestoff, V., (Eds.) 2008. „Images and Concepts Ofthe Third Sector In Europe”, EMAS WP 08/02
Cnaan, R. A., Milofsky, C., (eds) 2008. „Handbook of Community Movements and Local Organizations”, Springer.
Flynn, P., Hodgkinson, V. A., 2001. „Measuring The Impacts of the Nonprofit Sector”. Kluwer Academic, New York.
Evers, A., Laville, Jean-Louis 2004 „The Third Sector in Europe. Globalization and Welfare”. Edward Elgar Publishing.
OECD, 2003 „The Nonprofit Sector in a Changing Economy”. Paris.
Osborne, Stephen, P. (ed) 2008 „The Third Sector in Europe. Prospects and Challenges”. Routledge, London and New York.Powell, Walter W., and Steinberg, R., „The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook”. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ronbinson , J. W., Green G.P., (2011) „Introduction to Community Development” SAGE, Los Angeles.
Jon Van Til, 2000 (2008) ”Growing Civil Society. From Nonprofit Sector to Third Space”, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
II. RECOMMENDED READING
Clarke, G., Jennings M., (eds), 2008, „Development, Civil Society and Faith-Based Organizations. Bridging the Sacred and the Secular.” Palgrave,New York.
McNabb, D., 2008, „Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Sector. Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.” ch. 5: Research in Nonprofit Organizations, (59-68). MESharp Inc., New York.
Fergusson, D., 2005, „Church, State and Civil Society” : Cambridge Univ. Press.
Friedman, L., McGarvie, M. D., 2003 „Charity, Philantropy, and Civility in American History”. Cambridge University Press, USA.
Johnson, T. G., Otto, M. D., Deller, S. C., 201006. „Community Policy Analysis Modeling” Blackwell Publ., USA.
Okrasa, W., Lapins, J., Vremis, M., 2006. „Measuring Community Deprivation for Geographic Targeting of Public Resources” , Statistics in Transition, Journal of Polish Statistical Association, Vol. 7, Nr. 5, June 2006.
Okrasa, W., Witek, B., 2013. „The Influence of Inter-Sector Relationships on Public Resource Allocation: Does the Level of Community Deprivation Count? An evaluation approach”, Instytut Spraw Publicznych UJ.
Pavlish, C. P., Pharris, M. D., 2012. „Community-Based Collaborative Action Research”, Jone & Barlett Sudbary, MA.
Salamon, Lester M. (ed) 2002 „The State of Nonprofit America”. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
Salamon, Lester M., S. Wojciech Sokolowski, „Beyond Nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the Third Sector.” Voluntas (2016) 27:1515–1545
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: