Criminology process Principles of cooperation between the statutory authority and legal experts WP-PRZ-mon-pkzwopzb
- http://Brak
- http://Brak. (term 2021/22_Z)
The concept of an expert. Conditions for admission of expert evidence. The expert opinion. The decision to admit evidence from opinion. Preliminary consultation precedes an order to admit evidence from opinion. Principles of cooperation process with the statutory authority relating to the performance of expertise. The principal powers and duties of expertise and authority process. Evaluation of expert evidence in a criminal trial.
Principles of cooperation with the statutory authority of the process of carrying out particular types of expertise: Fingerprinting, forensic document examination, expertise mechanoskopijna; traseologia; study of firearms and ammunition; study of biological evidence, forensic physico-chemical; rules to identify human scent; fonoskopia.
|
Term 2021/22_Z:
None |
(in Polish) E-Learning
Term 2020/21_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy | Term 2019/20_L: (in Polish) E-Learning z podziałem na grupy | Term 2021/22_Z: (in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy |
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
PR_W02 - Student knows and understands the rules of admission of expert evidence in the Polish criminal trial.
PR_W03 - The student has knowledge of the shaping of the institution of an expert in the Polish legal system.
PR_W04 - The student knows the principles of cooperation process with the statutory authority relating to the performance of different types of expertise.
PR_W06 - The student knows the rights and duties of the process and the expert associated with performing expertise.
PR_W07 - The student knows the methods of formulating the decision on the admission of evidence.
PR_U07 - The student is able to interpret and apply the rules of law relating to co-operation with the statutory authority of the process associated with performing expertise.
PR_U08 - The student is able to draw up a decision to admit evidence from an opinion in certain types of expert opinions.
PR_U09 - The student is able to design an oral presentation on issues related to the conduct of individual types of expertise.
PR_K01 - The graduate supplements the knowledge in the field of cooperation between the trial authority and the expert.
PR_K02 - The graduate correctly identifies the dilemmas related to the performance of the expert function.
PR_K03 - A graduate is able to cooperate in a team, e.g. issuing a comprehensive opinion.
Description ECTS
4 ECTS X 25 hours = 100 hours.,
16 hours - Lectures,
54 hours - Preparation for classes,
22 hours - Preparing for the exam,
8 hours - Consultation.
Practical placement
Brak
Bibliography
Basic literature:
J. Żylińska, Współpraca organu procesowego z biegłym a trafność opinii, Warszawa 2008.
Tomaszewski T., Dowód z opinii biegłego w procesie karnym, Kraków 2000.
E. Gruza, M. Goc, J. Moszczyński, Kryminalistyka, czyli o współczesnych metodach dowodzenia przestępstw, Warszawa 2020.
Supplementary literature:
Ślady kryminalistyczne. Ujawnianie, zabezpieczanie, wykorzystanie, Praca zbiorowa pod redakcją naukową M. Goca, J. Moszczyńskiego, Warszawa 2007.
E. Gruza, M. Goc, J. Moszczyński, Kryminalistyka – czyli rzecz o metodach śledczych, Warszawa 2008.
|
Term 2021/22_Z:
None |
Notes
|
Term 2021/22_Z:
None |
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: