Cultural anthropology WNP-PEZ-ANTKU

K) A student should define and explain in philosophical language the phenomena of modern culture such as individualism, secularization, transformation of values. The student has a philosophical (theoretical) understanding of man as maker and the subject of culture.
(S) A student can formulate in philosophical language the problems relating to observed socio-cultural phenomena.
(C) A student is open to implementing theoretical problems of philosophy into his professional practice, thus achieving a greater awareness of culture and culture-building relationships.

STUDENT’S ACTIVITY and hour labour inputs
Lecture hours ......................................... 15
Preparing for classes and reading ....... 15
Sitting for an exam ........................ 15

__________________________________________
Total number of ECTS credits 2

1) A Forming Evaluation:
– for grade 2 (unsatisfactory) – A student does not know the definitions of the basic concepts of philosophical anthropology, ethics.
- for grade 3 (satisfactory) – A student correctly demonstrates knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology), however has no ability to analyze the relationships between cultural phenomena selected in a philosophical description; a student is able to make basic comparisons of the language of language of the humanities, art and religion.
- for grade 4 (good) – A student not only properly presents knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology), but sees the elementary differences between the languages of the humanities, art and religion. Furthermore, a student is able to make basic comparisons of the philosophical interpretations of the facts of culture and that which occurred in the other humanities.
Students not only properly presents knowledge of the fundamental concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology) and has the ability to analyze the relationship between cultural phenomena selected in the description of the philosophical and distinguish of reality descriptions made in the language of science, art and religion, but is able to carry out basic comparisons cultural interpretation formulated in various the humanities (eg, philosophy with pedagogic).
- for grade 5 (very good) – A student not only compares various interpretation of the fact of culture(philosophical, educational, psychological, sociological, Cultural Studies) and knows the different languages of describing reality (science, art, and religion), but can draw conclusions from the made comparisons and relate them to contemporary culture and educational practice .
2) A final grade: To obtain a final mark, the student will be required to pass a test to demonstrate familiarity with the content of lectures, suggested textbook, obligatory reading and additional reading for the lecture.
a) In the full-time teaching mode, the test consists of 14-15 tasks. For the grade 3.0, the student must obtain 7-8 points; for a score of 3.5-9-10 points; for a grade of 4.0 - 11-12 points; to score 4.5 - 13 points; for a grade of 5.0 - 14-15 points.
b) In the e-learning mode, the following rules are applied: (1) The number of tasks is 30; (2) All questions are "closed", the single-choice test (one of the three possible answers is correct), (3) the exam takes 30 minutes. (4) score: the maximum number of points is 30 (6) grades: 5.0 = 28-30 points; 4.5 = 25-27 points; 4.0 = 22-24 points; 3.5 = 19-21 points; 3.0 = 16-18 points; 2.0 = 0-15 points (exam failed).

M. A. Krąpiec, S. Kamiński, Z. Zdybicka [i inni], Wprowadzenie do filozofii, Lublin 1996;S. Kamiński, Jak filozofować?, Lublin 1989;Tenże, Światopogląd, religia, teologia, Lublin 1998;M. Kurdziałek, Średniowiecze w poszukiwaniu równowagi między arystotelizmem a platonizmem, Lublin !996;M. J. Adler, Dziesięć błędów filozoficznych,Warszawa b.r; M.A. Krąpiec, J. Sochoń, Porzucić świat absurdów, Lublin 2002;S. Swieżawski, Istnienie i tajemnica, Lublin 1993;tenże, Święty Tomasz na nowo odczytany, Lublin;tenże, Dzieje europejskiej filozofii klasycznej, Warszawa – Wrocław 2000;E. Gilson, Bóg i filozofia, Warszawa 1961;tenże, Chrystianizm a filozofia, Warszawa 1958;S. Swieżawski, Wstępy do q. 75- 89 Sth 1, w: Św. Tomasz z Akwinu,Traktat o człowieku, Summa teologii 1, 75 - 89, przeł. i oprac. S. Swieżawski, Warszawa 1998;R. Darowski, Filozofia człowieka. Zarys problematyki. Antologia tekstów, Kraków 2002;W. Chudy, Drugie śniadanie u Sokratesa, Warszawa 2004;K. Wojtyła, Rozważania o istocie człowieka, Kraków 1999;Jan Paweł II, Encyklika Fides et ratio, Rzym 14.09.1998;M. A. Krapiec, U podstaw rozumienia kultury,RW KUL, Lublin 1991, ss. 265; tenże, Filozofia w teologii. Czytając Encyklikę Fides et ratio, Lublin 1999; tenże, O Filozofii, Lublin 2008;A. Maryniarczyk; Dla-czego tomizm? Lublin 2001;J. Ratzinger, Wiara, prawda, tolerancja, Kielce 2005;Z.J. Zdybicka, Jan Paweł II – filozof i mistyk, Lublin 2009;taż, Bóg czy sacrum, Lublin 2007;

Information on level of this course, year of study and semester when the course unit is delivered, types and amount of class hours - can be found in course structure diagrams of apropriate study programmes. This course is related to the following study programmes:

• Education - part-time second-cycle studies

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

• Description of WNP-PEZ-ANTKU in USOSweb