Cultural anthropology WNP-PE-AKW

https://teams.microsoft.com/l/team/19%3a91e7cc98533e42088050092a0178ac05%40thread.tacv2/conversations?groupId=55ef9e10-c669-4b57-a9c7-8fb4f2c549b8&tenantId=12578430-c51b-4816-8163-c7281035b9b3

Lecture no. 1: Cultural theory or human theory?
Lecture no. 2: Culture as a subject of scientific research.
Lecture no. 3: Fields of culture: science, morality, art, religion.
Lecture no. 4: Post-Christian culture.
Lecture no. 5: Modernity: a disenchanted world?
Lecture no. 6: Post-truth culture as a culture of freedom.
Lecture no.7: CULTURE AS A LABORATORY FOR HUMANISTS AND RESEARCHERS
Lecture no. 8: In the name of progress. Sexualization.
Lecture no. 9: Mastering awareness through culture. A new identity.
Lecture no. 10: New language - new person?
Lecture no. 11: Changes in forms of communication and cultural changes.
Lecture no. 12: Society in the era of individualism
Lecture no. 13: Home - common space.
Lecture 14: Happy Man?
Lecture no. 15: God or the sacred?

(in Polish) E-Learning

(in Polish) E-Learning (pełny kurs) z podziałem na grupy

(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych

(in Polish) nie dotyczy

(in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS

STUDENT’S ACTIVITY and hour labour inputs Lecture hours ......................................... 30 Preparing for classes and reading ....... 30 Sitting for an exam ........................ 30 __________________________________________ Total number of ECTS credits 3

Subject level

intermediate

Learning outcome code/codes

NP2_W10, NP2_U08, NP2_K04

Type of subject

obligatory

Preliminary Requirements

Basic knowledge of philosophy, including ethics; sociology, psychology and pedagogy provided for in the study program.

Course coordinators

Maria Boużyk

Learning outcomes

K) A student should define and explain in philosophical language the phenomena of modern culture such as individualism, secularization, transformation of values. The student has a philosophical (theoretical) understanding of man as maker and the subject of culture.
(S) A student can formulate in philosophical language the problems relating to observed socio-cultural phenomena.
(C) A student is open to implementing theoretical problems of philosophy into his professional practice, thus achieving a greater awareness of culture and culture-building relationships.

STUDENT’S ACTIVITY and hour labour inputs
Lecture hours ......................................... 30
Preparing for classes and reading ....... 15
Sitting for an exam ........................ 15

__________________________________________
Total number of ECTS credits 2

Assessment criteria

1) A Forming Evaluation:
– for grade 2 (unsatisfactory) – A student does not know the definitions of the basic concepts of philosophical anthropology, ethics.
- for grade 3 (satisfactory) – A student correctly demonstrates knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology), however has no ability to analyze the relationships between cultural phenomena selected in a philosophical description; a student is able to make basic comparisons of the language of language of the humanities, art and religion.
- for grade 4 (good) – A student not only properly presents knowledge of the basic concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology), but sees the elementary differences between the languages of the humanities, art and religion. Furthermore, a student is able to make basic comparisons of the philosophical interpretations of the facts of culture and that which occurred in the other humanities.
Students not only properly presents knowledge of the fundamental concepts of philosophy (ethics, anthropology) and has the ability to analyze the relationship between cultural phenomena selected in the description of the philosophical and distinguish of reality descriptions made in the language of science, art and religion, but is able to carry out basic comparisons cultural interpretation formulated in various the humanities (eg, philosophy with pedagogic).
- for grade 5 (very good) – A student not only compares various interpretation of the fact of culture(philosophical, educational, psychological, sociological, Cultural Studies) and knows the different languages of describing reality (science, art, and religion), but can draw conclusions from the made comparisons and relate them to contemporary culture and educational practice .
2) A final grade: To obtain a final mark, the student will be required to pass a test to demonstrate familiarity with the content of lectures, suggested textbook, obligatory reading and additional reading for the lecture.
a) In the full-time teaching mode, the test consists of 14-15 tasks. For the grade 3.0, the student must obtain 7-8 points; for a score of 3.5-9-10 points; for a grade of 4.0 - 11-12 points; to score 4.5 - 13 points; for a grade of 5.0 - 14-15 points.
b) In the e-learning mode, the following rules are applied: (1) The number of tasks is 30; (2) All questions are "closed", the single-choice test (one of the three possible answers is correct), (3) the exam takes 30 minutes. (4) score: the maximum number of points is 30 (6) grades: 5.0 = 28-30 points; 4.5 = 25-27 points; 4.0 = 22-24 points; 3.5 = 19-21 points; 3.0 = 16-18 points; 2.0 = 0-15 points (exam failed).

Bibliography

P. Jaroszynski, M. Anderson, Ethics. The Drama of the Moral Life, St.Pauls ed., 1997; A. Terruwe, C. BaarsPsychic Wholeness and Healing. Using All the Powers of the Human Psyche,, St.Pauls ed.;E. Gilson, God and Philosophy, Yale Univesity Press; J. Maritain, Man and the State, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1951; M. Novak Catholic Social Thought and Liberal Institutions Freedom with Justice, 1989; Theiry of Being to understand reality, ed. S. Kamiński, M. Kurdziałek, Z. Zybicka, TN KUL, Lublin 1980.

Additional information

Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system:

Description of WNP-PE-AKW in USOSweb