Accessibility of justice in Poland (Objective 16) WF-OB-ZR-SI
The range of activities undertaken under SGDs Objective 16: Promote a peaceful and inclusive society, ensure access to justice for all, and build inclusive, effective and accountable institutions at all levels is very broad. One such task included in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is Promoting the rule of law at national and international levels and ensuring equal access to justice for all (16.3) and Developing effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels (16.6).
The topic of the class will concern the presentation of the legal framework shaping the accessibility of justice in Polish law. Particular attention will be paid to the presentation of the constitutional basis for the right to court (Article 45 of the Constitution) and the prohibition on closing the judicial route (Article 77(2) of the Constitution).
The class will discuss basic issues concerning the formation of access to a common court in civil cases . The class will address the subject of accessibility to court in administrative cases. Attention will be paid to the role played by the administrative judiciary in relation to the control of public administration activities.
(in Polish) Grupa przedmiotów ogólnouczenianych
(in Polish) Opis nakładu pracy studenta w ECTS
Subject level
Learning outcome code/codes
Type of subject
Preliminary Requirements
Course coordinators
Learning outcomes
A. Knowledge
1. has the terminology to describe the system of law and the purpose of the 16 SDGs, in particular in relation to the justice system in Poland
2. has knowledge to reproduce the assumptions of accessibility to justice
3. has knowledge of the principles of access to common courts and administrative court
B. Skills
4. interprets legal acts and on their basis draws correct conclusions (identifies, searches for legal acts and interprets the provisions correctly)
5. is able to identify individual solutions forming the right to court
C. Competences
6. is aware of the importance of the accessibility of justice for the formation of civil society and a democratic state of law
7. is able to work individually, showing initiative and autonomy in actions, and to cooperate effectively in teamwork, performing various roles in it.
Assessment criteria
essay, class activity
Practical placement
none
Bibliography
M. Kłopocka, Prawo do sądu w orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis „Prawo” Tom LXXVI, 2007
Z. Czeszejko-Sochacki, Prawo do sądu w świetle Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (ogólna charakterystyka), „Państwo i Prawo” 1997, nr 11–12
P. Sarnecki, Komentarz do art. 45 Konstytucji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, [w:] L. Garlicki (red.), Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz III, Warszawa 2003
Kmieciak Z., Postępowanie administracyjne i sądowoadministracyjne a prawo europejskie, Warszawa 2010
Complementary literature
Hauser R., w: R. Hauser, J. Drachal, E. Mzyk, Dwuinstancyjne sądownictwo administracyjne, Warszawa–Zielona Góra 2003
Łazarska A., Rzetelny proces cywilny – przegląd definicji prawa do rzetelnego procesu, Warszawa, 2012
P. Pogonowski, Realizacja prawa do sądu w postępowaniu cywilnym, Warszawa 2005
|
Term 2022/23_Z:
M. Kłopocka, Prawo do sądu w orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis „Prawo” Tom LXXVI, 2007 |
Notes
|
Term 2022/23_Z:
none |
Additional information
Additional information (registration calendar, class conductors, localization and schedules of classes), might be available in the USOSweb system: